I come from the old school of the film days which disciplined me to get my exposure right in camera. We could not afford to get it wrong in-camera. Correctly exposed and properly composed images every time. Well, we’ve all messed things up from time to time!
Things have changed quite dramatically since we started to insert a CF or a SD card in the back of the camera instead of a roll of film. Photographers in general have become lazy, not thinking before clicking the shutter! I’ve heard this phrase a million times now:
‘ I’m shooting RAW, I can go 2 stops over or under in Photoshop ‘
Why oh why oh why!!! Why can’t one get the exposure right before clicking the shutter. If you enjoy sitting in front of a computer all day long then be my guest. The thing is, many photographers don’t cost the time in front of the computer. Just because its their own time, it seems to me that it doesn’t matter how much one spends on a computer. Time is money. If you employed someone to do your editing, you’ll have to pay him or her, right?
I shoot in Manual mode. Its my old habit and even though the metering in the new camera bodies is very good, I’m not going to let a computer decide my exposure for me. I have an image in my mind before I click the shutter, the camera does not know what I’ve got in mind. I know how much light goes through my lens. You may say I’m being a control freak, well yeah. I save tons and tons of time as my exposures, right across the board are consistent when I download them. I don’t need to tweak each and every image. I colour correct one image from a batch and then batch process the lot. My workflow is pretty simple and straight forward, I only use Aperture and hardly ever have the need to go into Photoshop.
I’m not trying to say that shooting in Manual is the right way or the only way to get the exposure right in camera. I know a lot of very good photographers who shoot in Aperture / Shutter priority mode, their exposures are consistent due to the fact that they see the light and make a judgment on how much light they need and then click the shutter by using a variety of options on the camera body i.e spot metering, locking the exposure and re-composing etc.
At a recent seminar, I was talking about how many images I shoot at a wedding (which is around 600-700 and the couple get to see around 250). I shoot alone so don’t have a 2nd shooter. One of the guys in the room disagreed and I asked him why. He said that there is no way in the world I can tell a ‘full’ story of the day with so few images, I asked him how many he shot at a wedding and if he was willing to share how much was his average package price. He said he shot about 3,000 images, that’s right, three thousand images and he his average price is between £1200 – £1400. I asked him how long it takes him to edit & process the wedding, 8 days, he said. Do you think he is going to make a profit on this wedding at this price ? I think not. Machine gunning a wedding or a portrait shoot is not the way to photograph, you need to photograph like a sniper, wait…aim…click.
Now I’m not saying that what he is doing is wrong. Each to their own. All I wanted to do is put my point across of value your time. Selling at a low price can be very profitable if you have the right work flow and the business model in place. In fact, some of my most profitable products are the low priced ones.
To conclude, I truly believe that creating an image ‘correctly’ within the camera and not on the computer will save you tons and tons of time. Its simple and easy. All I do is set my aperture and just change the shutter speed if I need to before I click.
Oz
Related posts:
- Problem with off-camera flash
- Business of Photography: 3rd March 2010
- Aperture 3
- Aperture 3: Workflow
- Creative Lighting with Wireless Flash
Tags: Calumet, Free Seminar, Free Stuff, Seminar, Weddings, Workflow










Leave A Reply (6 comments So Far)
Jerry Tomko
690 days ago
Thank God! Someone has the guts to say this. I myself shot film and I have been photographing weddings for 28 + years, long before any of these “professionals” even held a camera. I would not say I am from the “old school” but I never had the luxury to look at the back of the camera to amke sure I “GOT IT RIGHT”! At the recent WPPI convention there was more “software” for sale to make bad pictures look good. Of course it does not mean anything to a bride when the price is so low, she thinks it is a “great deal”. How do we get back to the “ART” of photography instead of the “art of so-called graphic design”? It is not all about the clients anymore, it is about a bunch of photographers trying to impress other photographers. Sorry I am rambling.
James Crawford
690 days ago
Couldn’t agree more with this but I have to admit that Photoshop has helped me out on more than one occasion with White Balance. I still remember that sinking feeling when I realised I’d shot a portrait session (using flash heads) with my White Balance still set to Tungsten – yeuch!
So now the White Balance is the first thing I set before even thinking about exposure.
Uzair Kharawala
690 days ago
James
We’ve all have messed up from time to time and PS is a great tool, I’m not knocking it, but to use PS as an excuse for shooting cr*p, I don’t buy that.
Oz
Uzair Kharawala
690 days ago
Sometimes I do wonder whether we need to be a better photographer or a better photoshopper these days!!!
Ken Beck
690 days ago
I am also from the old school in the camera not photoshop