Comments on: Paper faster for reading, but iPad and Kindle are close http://sfphotoschool.com/paper-faster-for-reading-but-ipad-and-kindle-are-close/ Photography School for Photographers. Learn Portrait & Wedding tips & techniques for free. Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:37:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Uzair Kharawala http://sfphotoschool.com/paper-faster-for-reading-but-ipad-and-kindle-are-close/comment-page-1/#comment-135 Uzair Kharawala Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:12:51 +0000 http://sfphotoschool.com/?p=1235#comment-135 I certainly think that iPad / Kindle are for convenience and accessibility. When I'm on a train or a tube, I'll prefer an iPad, when I'm reading in bed, I prefer a book. That's just me. Oz I certainly think that iPad / Kindle are for convenience and accessibility. When I’m on a train or a tube, I’ll prefer an iPad, when I’m reading in bed, I prefer a book. That’s just me.

Oz

]]> By: daniel venter http://sfphotoschool.com/paper-faster-for-reading-but-ipad-and-kindle-are-close/comment-page-1/#comment-131 daniel venter Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:51:53 +0000 http://sfphotoschool.com/?p=1235#comment-131 I don't believe that the ipad or similar devices where designed so that people read things faster. It's more around convenience e.g I can store 10 reading books into my ipad and take it with me all over the place - can you do the same carrying 10 physical books all over the show? I bet you'd get very frustrated! I don't bother with printed books anymore cause it would simply clutter up my space, which by the way I've now saved half a dozen trees at the same time as space. So I think the person who set this comparison must be slightly old school. I don’t believe that the ipad or similar devices where designed so that people read things faster. It’s more around convenience e.g I can store 10 reading books into my ipad and take it with me all over the place – can you do the same carrying 10 physical books all over the show? I bet you’d get very frustrated! I don’t bother with printed books anymore cause it would simply clutter up my space, which by the way I’ve now saved half a dozen trees at the same time as space. So I think the person who set this comparison must be slightly old school.

]]>